|
if you read all the previous threads properly. u will realise that NONE of the threads criticize or "attack" xun ren who is rightly so the champion. there are only threads that criticize gong jiao, the semi-final adjudicator and the debate motion in the finals. so those up there, how did you draw conclusion that we are at "hu xiang can sha" ? perhaps for a start in debate, debaters need to draw the correct conclusion from a set of facts.
 i guess: the more i explain, the more i'm being understood. so this will be my last thread. I love debate. and i hope you guys/gals out there will love it too. And to really love it, we need to get involved in it, not just as spectators but as debaters ourselves. The interesting thing about debate is that no matter what the outcome of a discussion is, we will learn something from the process and not the outcome. I hope everyone has learned something. for me, i've definitely learned my lesson. Happy Learning in Debate. Cheers. SL |