中马赛群英会

野兽修行

国能大学将会举行一场群英会来示范中马赛的新赛制：

日期：2004年7月27日（星期二）
时间：晚上8时正
地点：国能大学校园
票价：rm5
联络：纹敏012-6990582 彦仪012-3883278

这场表演赛将会由大马辩坛两派老将，偶像派对垒实力派！

大会主持：刘慧美 （988 dj）

偶像派：
1。郑静婷 （channel 8节目主持）
2。龙纹敏 （channel 8新闻主播）
3。萧慧敏 （astro i 节目主持，my fm dj）
4。胡渐彪 （ntv 7 新闻主播，wah fm dj）

实力派：
1。陈勋亮 （马大教练）
2。郑立恒 （博大教练）
3。陈桂生 （赛柏多媒体教练）
4。颜江翰 （墨尔本大学教练）

欲定购门票，请联络上述两位联络负责人。请大家踊跃出席~

Slot

哇,星光闪烁!
赛制是怎么样的,可否公布一下.

慧敏

谢谢野兽帮我们把消息传开来：）
但是有一点误会了，这次群英会的赛制不是中马赛的新赛制。此次赛制是我们综合各比赛后讨论出来的，中马赛筹委说他们会作为参考但不一定会采用。他们还说希望在当天见到个大专代表，请他们给中马赛赛制一些意见。

群英会的赛制如下：

（1）正方和反方一辩呈词：各4分钟
对方任何一位代表可以在中途进行咨询，最少三次。唯在前30秒和后30秒不能打岔。

（2）正方和反方二辩反驳+呈词：各4 分钟
对方任何一位代表可以在中途进行咨询，最少三次。唯在前30秒和后30秒不能打岔。

（3）正方三辩盘问：总时间2分钟
辩手可盘问反方的四位代表，盘问手有权终止对方的回答。总时间是两分钟。
然后到反方三辩进行盘问。规则如上。

（4）正方和反方三辩小结：各2分钟
辩手必须针对刚才的盘问环节进行小总结。

（5）自由辩论，各队5分钟。

（6）正方和反方总结：各4分钟

希望各位多多支持，谢谢 ：）

易杰

超级想去看啊~~~~~~~~~~

木火四

赛制不错,但对新辩手就会较吃力.

还蛮期待这星光耀耀的演出.

为何不见晓凌和国文.好象有点点CHS的味道.

见笑了.

Slot

对抗性应该很好玩的.

可以第1和2里面是最少三次,还是应该是最多三次?每次的质询限时多少?

水若寒

我觉得应该想办法让胡渐彪和王东旋辩一场。

野兽修行

呵呵，看来我传达的资讯错误多多。可能传话的过程中出现了差错，国能辩论队的朋友，抱歉抱歉~

zhongma

[DISABLELBCODE]

weiloh1

This is a very fun debate friendly match. It shown a different way of debate. Although some friends thought that this was too entertaining,personally I believe we should not always restrict ourselves that debate has to be serious! Well done and well organize, Tenage University!

chan

看完了中马群英赛， 台上八位辩手都很卖力。不过比赛规则太新，太怪，台上有些混乱，在台下的观众看得也有点乱，火花没想象中的精彩。希望这种赛制不会出现在正式的比赛。不过结辩环节很不错，彪哥表现依然很好。不过小弟觉得郑立恒和陈桂生表现最好！

HCl

我反而蛮喜欢质问那一环，

只是制度有点新，
辩手们可能不习惯。。

我个人认为立恒将这一环呈现的不错。。

erica

that is the mixture of parliamentary stlye n the quanbian style, right?

kaiyet

i have a little comment as to the style itself. not saying that it is not interesting or unsatisfactory...

firstly, i would think that 3 questions to first and second speaker is too many. it  distort a speaker's mind flow. even in english debate, similar style, each speaker will have 7 minutes, they only required(mandatory) to take 2 questions(english term: point of information), any amount more than that would be see as detriment to ur own case, because u r merely giving opportunity to ur opponent to strike on u.

second, trick can be used by the opponents in the 1st and 2nd speaker's sppech, therefore the chairperson must implement the rules strictly. no question in the first and last 30 second means no question will be asked, eventhough the question asked before the bell ring, once the bell rang, the person asking question must immediately sit down. it only will be fair to the speaker.

third, the cross-examination session of the third speaker. it looks to me very mess. what is more appropriate, i think is to adopt the cross examination session that used by the third speaker in quan bian. quan bian style provide both the speaker an opportunity to explain their case, so that things like 'kou mao zhi' would not happen and it produce a fair opportunity to both side.

however, the invention of the new style is a good start to malaysia chinese debate. the aadition of the point of information, cross examination session will train up the mind of the debaters to react quickly. it will produce debaters that are competent to win some international title and make the local debate arena to be more competitive. afterall, this is a fun, interesting yet entertaining style of debate.

cheers,
kaiyet