|
|
发表于 2008-10-9 15:21:51
|
显示全部楼层
I think the main point to tackle this topic is the definition of "exams", from which we can make the debate easy and understandable...
The widely accepted definition of "Exams" is those exams that we will have to pass in our school courses, but here we can regard it as "the test of all the professionals" (of course under the condition of absolute prevention of cheating)
From this point of view, not only the school course tests can be treated as an exam, all the tests to the professionals can be regarded as "exams". For example, a race on the track for Michael Schumacher is a serious exam, a boxing campain is an exam for a boxer or wrestler, a competition of CS or Warcraft is an exam for the game players. Of all the exams, both the results and the process are fairly important for the game players. What is more, the game players can absorb more ingredients about the meaning of life from this every game the have played, in order to gain a better result in the next contest. From a broader point of view, in every stage of life for everyone of us, we may encounter so many exams, the result of those exams can indeed be a tester of our professionalism of a certain profession.
Last but not least, in fact so called "exams" exist everywhere, the only difference of them is the rule of the game. The game of the government, the bandit society and the college entrance examination are surely not the same. Therefore, there can be governers, bandit heros and No. 1 students. But after all, they are all heros, because they are all those who benefit from those rules of the games. |
|